According to reports, the Beijing Municipal Bureau of Health stated that all colleges and universities should incorporate the work of unpaid blood donation into the evaluation indicators for various departments, community organizations, and individual teachers and students.

Unpaid blood donation is linked to the interests of teachers and students. It seems to be inconsistent with the tradition of “voluntary awareness,” but careful consideration is also considered to be a disaster. The first is that the content of the link is an honor for “excellence”, and no one is forced to make it. Second, in terms of international practices, such as in Japan, there is a provision “All men and women younger than 20 years old on the anniversary of adulthood. At that time, the group donated blood once. Then there was the opportunity to participate in work or apply for a driver's license. There were also many opportunities for blood donation.

However, "blood donation" is free and linked to "price". Why does it cause social concern? This question cannot be separated from two aspects: In addition to ordinary teachers and students, has the functional department exhausted other more powerful means to promote the development of unpaid blood donation? In the case of preemptive obligations, have the rights of blood donors been properly placed? Some people say that the most important link to the evaluation is the civil service group. Others say that blood shortages are just as shocking as wasting blood... In this regard, the functional department only has two choices: either face public questions, give a response, or The hooking system itself reflects on it.

Unpaid blood donation is an end point. There are many ways to get there. If you have problems and think of blindly “linking”, don’t blame the public for ridiculing the gesture is not elegant enough.